<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>New RIFERS blogs entries from Tyler Pitchford in category war_quips_</title>
		<link>http://rifers.org/blogs</link>
		<description>The feeds of the Rifers community blogs</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>Copyright of the content contained is attributed to the original authors</copyright>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:59:40 +0200</pubDate>
		<managingEditor>Rifers Blogs: https://rifers.org/blogs</managingEditor>
		
			<item>
				<title>Can Wardialing help in a war?</title>
				<link>http://rifers.org/blogs/tyler.pitchford/2006/12/5/can_wardialing_help_in_a_war</link>
				<description>First off, finals are over and I&apos;m back to being human for a few months (yay!). Second I still love RIFE and now I&apos;ll have time to use it. Thrid and the point of this post is can the old BBS days trick of Wardialing to find connections help in a war?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I mean is there have been several articles posted on bombs being set off remotely by cell phones in Iraq and other places like Bangladesh. I was just wondering if it would be possible to have the phone company periodically just ring all the phones and set off the bombs before they&apos;re supposed to detonate. Obviously using simple triangulation, etc. the possible canidates for dialing could be lowered, but either way it&apos;s still the principle that&apos;s interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Might be better than using cell phone jammers. If nothing else it would make the detonators more complex and harder to build instead of a simple 5V or whatever pulse off the phones speaker there would have to be some kind of tone reader to check for key presses or at least a counter for X rings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
  Tyler  </description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:04:24 +0100</pubDate>
				<author>Tyler Pitchford</author>
				<guid>http://rifers.org/blogs/tyler.pitchford/2006/12/5/can_wardialing_help_in_a_war</guid>
			</item>
		
		
	</channel>
</rss>